中文 |

Newsroom

Scientists Reveal Differences of Cloud Top Height between Satellites and Ground-based Radar

Apr 16, 2021

Clouds play a key role in balancing incoming and outgoing solar and thermal radiation. Physical attributes including cloud height, particle size, and particle concentration determine the radiative forcing effect of a cloud, or how much incoming radiation that a cloud reflects back to space.

Satellites and ground-based radar can measure the cloud top height (CTH). However, inconsistencies exist between various satellites and radar data due to different detection methods and algorithms used to process raw information.

To quantify these conflicts, LIU Bo, jointly supervised by Dr. HUO Juan and Prof. LYU Daren from the Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, compared CTH data between the FY-4A and Himawari-8 satellites as well as data from ground-based millimeter-wave radar sites in Yangbajing, Tibet (YBJ) and in Beijing.

Known as the "Roof of the World", the Tibetan Plateau provides an ideal location for satellite meteorologists to study. The vast region features high elevation, ideal atmospheric conditions to observe CTH, and sparse weather reporting stations, which is optimal for testing large quantities of satellite data. China's meteorological satellite FY-4A and Japan's Himawari-8 satellite are geostationary satellites both equipped with an advanced radiation imager, which provides a wealth of CTH data.

Results from high-level cloud analysis suggest that the observed CTH difference between radar and satellite data increases gradually with an increase of surface temperature. This indicates that surface temperature, which affects satellite data retrieval accuracy, may be a key factor causing the regional discrepancy between Beijing and YBJ, which is 4300m above sea level.

The average CTH differences, measured in kilometers, between radar and satellite data at YBJ were 0.06 km and -0.02 km, compared to 0.93 km and 0.99 km at Beijing, for FY-4A and Himawari-8, respectively. Thin high-level cirrus clouds show the largest CTH variation.

 

Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of CTH detection by satellites (FY-4A and Himawari-8) and ground-based radar sites (from YBJ and Beijing, respectively). (Image by LIU Bo)

 

Fig. 2 Clouds observed at YBJ with snow-capped mountains in the distance. (Image by LIU Bo) 

Additionally, at YBJ, the study showed that Himawari-8 missed more nighttime CTH data than FY-4A. Statistical results showed little difference between FY-4A and Himawari-8 data, although both satellites had different retrieval algorithms.

This study presents an initial quantitative comparison of CTH between satellite and ground-based radar over the Tibetan Plateau and provides a scientific guidance for application of CTH data.

This work was published in Advances in Atmospheric Sciences. It was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Contact

LIN Zheng

Institute of Atmospheric Physics

E-mail:

Assessment of FY-4A and Himawari-8 Cloud Top Height Retrieval through Comparison with Ground-Based Millimeter Radar at Sites in Tibet and Beijing

Related Articles
Contact Us
  • 86-10-68597521 (day)

    86-10-68597289 (night)

  • 86-10-68511095 (day)

    86-10-68512458 (night)

  • cas_en@cas.cn

  • 52 Sanlihe Rd., Xicheng District,

    Beijing, China (100864)

Copyright © 2002 - Chinese Academy of Sciences